Home     News     Entertainment     Communities     Classifieds     Shopping     Homes     Cars     Jobs    Customer Service

 Search news:
  
Website (7 days)
Archive (1999-)
  Home
  News
  Local News
  Local Sports
  Nation/World
  Obituaries
  Photo Galleries
  Family Tributes
  Opinion
  Technology
  Space & Science
  Weather
 
  Entertainment
  Communities
  Classifieds
  Shopping
  Cars
  Jobs
  Customer Service


 Saturday, December 18, 2004
Subscribe Today

Licenses stir debate


ADVERTISEMENT

The anti-terrorism bill signed by President Bush Friday has rekindled debate about whether standardized driver's licenses will become de facto national identification cards — opening the door to potential encroachment on personal privacy.

To be sure, we would insist that any legislation that might move us closer to such a system have safeguards against abuse by the government. There's no earthly reason why ID cards should be capable of tracking the movements of any individual, even if the technology exists to do so. But we believe there's nothing inherently wrong with requiring driver's license to have tougher counterfeiting protection built in — holograms, magnetic strips and features visible only under infrared light — stuff Virginia already does — or with standardizing them.

Let's be honest. No amount of fiddling with the design of a driver's license is going to make us safe from terrorism. If the bad guys can out-gun the good guys, they can muscle their way into or onto any platform they want. It's more likely that counterfeit-proof licenses will deter more would-be young drinkers than they will goons from al-Qaida.

Let's also be honest about some of the dangers to our privacy and civil liberties posed by a national ID card. The genie's already out of the bottle, where that's concerned; if you pay taxes and have a Social Security number, you aren't invisible; the feds can easily track you down, if necessary. The National Criminal Information Center has just about everything else covered.

In reality, standardized driver's licenses aren't a bad idea. They could theoretically save money if the design is created and printed at the federal level, leaving state licensing departments such as our DMV free to be points of issue. Standardized licenses would certainly save on hassle as we move from place to place.

As we said early on, we realize there's the potential for abuse of a national ID. We are not willing to surrender our civil liberties or our privacy for the sake of someone's perceived safety; as we also said, a national ID or driver's license won't prevent a terrorist attack. As long as the law is written with safeguards against abuse, we have no problem with having a national driver's license.

Originally published December 18, 2004

Print this article     Email this to a friend     Subscribe Now

Click to learn more...
Home | News | Entertainment| Communities | Customer Service
Classifieds | Shopping | Homes | Cars | Jobs
    Contact Us | Subscribe | Place an ad
Copyright ©2004 The News Leader. All rights reserved.
Use of this site indicates your agreement to the Terms of Service
(Terms updated 12/20/02)